Page 29 of 45
Re: War on cars
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 7:39 am
by outnabike
Tim wrote: ↑Sun Jan 02, 2022 3:38 pm
My take from the above linked paper.
City based large 4WD owners are more often than not; beer drinking, fat, middle aged males who are morally conservative, homophobic, rascist, selfish, intolerant, aggressive and belligerent.
Yep, about meets with my casual observations.
Damn right.... And to top it off I have a land cruiser a Ford ute and a bike.... I ought to be banned off the forum.... Praise de the lord I have been found out. The only thing what keeps me on the forum is the balanced view of the great members.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Wed Jan 05, 2022 8:12 am
by fat and old
I’ve read this, and have to admit I’m surprised. But not surprised sort of. There’s a few holes in the thing and some info missing but the results are there. I can see the behaviour observed happening too.
I’d like to see the same thing done with drivers using their own vehicles. Reckon there’d be a different outcome, but maybe not.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:40 am
by opik_bidin
https://youtu.be/tNOLLr_fvZ4
350 million AUD from Queenslanders fines, by traffic camera
2000 offenders a week
The driving culture and the chains to reign it in is crushing us
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:36 pm
by Thoglette
opik_bidin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:40 am
The driving culture and the chains to reign it in is crushing us
100 admissions to hospital
per day.
$30 billion per year for those beds and associated treatments.
Any **** about "revenue raising" is just that. It's better named a "stupidity tax".
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 11:23 am
by mikesbytes
Thoglette wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:36 pm
opik_bidin wrote: ↑Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:40 am
The driving culture and the chains to reign it in is crushing us
100 admissions to hospital
per day.
$30 billion per year for those beds and associated treatments.
Any **** about "revenue raising" is just that. It's better named a "stupidity tax".
The counter argument is that the fixed camera's aren't working on reducing deaths and injuries which is incorrect
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2022 6:31 pm
by mikesbytes
The car paradox
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:21 pm
by Cyclophiliac
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:33 pm
by Arbuckle23
Would there be any Harleys left on the road?
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2022 3:21 pm
by find_bruce
Thought you were going to link to this
Klaus Staeck, the provocative artist who challenged postwar Germany’s love of the car
If your German is a bit rusty, "This model is particularly good in traffic jams."
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:27 pm
by mikesbytes
Motorways dividing communities but when removing them there's a lot of considerations
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2022 12:28 pm
by Cyclophiliac
I didn't really know where else to post this, so here it is:
https://www.escape.com.au/destinations/ ... ryimage=14
Look for the subheading on cycling infrastructure. Of course, our state and federal governments are convinced they're supporting cyclists better than any country in the world, and are mostly blind to any suggestion it might actually be otherwise.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2022 1:55 pm
by Thoglette
Arbuckle23 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 15, 2022 2:33 pm
Would there be any Harleys left on the road?
Only those with stock exhaust systems.
No smiley
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2022 4:45 pm
by g-boaf
Yes please, they are in London too. Some of the four-cylinder tuned up shopping trolleys just sound like crap. These guys have never heard a really nice sounding machine like an F355 or a classic air-cooled 911. Even the Aston Martin Valkyrie with 11,100rpm and 1000hp from its V12 (with another 160hp electric boost on top of 1000hp) doesn't do those stupid look at me exhaust mapping.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2022 10:21 pm
by mikesbytes
There's a tiny mention of George st Sydney but no content. None the less there's some examples of what's happening in the US
Re: War on cars
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:29 pm
by opik_bidin
https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSMelbourne ... 3037109301
City traffic could be about to get worse under new plans to add more bike lanes to the CBD. Parking spaces and turning lanes will be removed in a proposal some business owners have savaged.
7NEWS at 6pm | More local news:
www.7news.com.au/news/vic
#7NEWS
--------------
Propaganda disguised as News so bike lanes are cancelled, and look at the comments.
best thing, is, to show Drivers they are the one who gets subsidised, and most comes from general tax. And for those shouting socialist or commy, hit back with selling off the roads for profit and get hit with tolls instead of taxes like West connex so roads churn out profit (Well, as it stands, there is a 40 billion loss as fuel and rego combined are 20 billion, while the cost is 60 billion)
it gets me thinking about transit which are forced to be profitable, why not treat the roads to be the same if you really want free market capitalism, no socialism and paying your fair share, not burdening the society.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:30 am
by g-boaf
mikesbytes wrote: ↑Fri Feb 25, 2022 10:21 pm
There's a tiny mention of George st Sydney but no content. None the less there's some examples of what's happening in the US
I remember riding on George Street in the old days, it wasn’t so bad but never been on it nowadays.
I reached out to the government regarding their new strategies for cycleways and the like, never got a response.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 11:27 pm
by Cyclophiliac
One of The Age's rare articles proposing various measures to reduce car use and slow down cars, the comments are pretty depressing, though. It's pretty clear cycling will never really take off here, there's too much anti-cyclist prejudice.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 5a2y3.html
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:04 pm
by Cyclophiliac
Can someone please explain to me why so many people want "performance" cars, designed to do speeds that aren't legal in most places anyway? I don't understand it. When they do drive at the cars' designed speeds, people tend to end up dead. It makes no sense to me.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/moto ... cc82f461ba
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:30 pm
by Comedian
In Brisbane, the Bicentennial bikeway is Brisbanes busiest bikeway, with typically 6000 movements a day (plus pedestrians). It's currently blocked by a floating restaurant which washed onto the bikeway. It's apparently going to be difficult to move so it's going to be some time (no one has said how long). More weeks or months than days.
Anyway, the 750m diversion is onto a footpath which is probably barely half a metre wide. It's not wide enough for two people to pass normally.. without one stopping and leaning over the guard rail onto the road. There are a couple of wide bits where there are light poles which are the best passing opportunities.
So, the bike advocates asked for one lane of the five car lanes as a temporary bikeway until the bikeway is open again. They replied nicely but firmly that while they liked people using bikes for transport, they prefer not to potentially inconvenience people driving cars. So just no.
A nice reminder of Brisbane Car Councils priorities.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:33 pm
by redsonic
Why am I not surprised
Re: War on cars
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:07 pm
by Thoglette
Cyclophiliac wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:04 pm
Can someone please explain to me why so many people want "performance" cars,
Phew, for a moment then I thought you might have been unfairly picking on “performance pickup trucks”. You know what that leads to…
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 2:35 pm
by fat and old
Thoglette wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 6:07 pm
Cyclophiliac wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:04 pm
Can someone please explain to me why so many people want "performance" cars,
Phew, for a moment then I thought you might have been unfairly picking on “performance pickup trucks”. You know what that leads to…
Mate, gimme a chance and I’m all in on this one! One of the glaringly obvious hypocrisies hereabouts is the need for speed, in any form of transport. Add to that that somehow the drivers of these vehicles are capable of using them with absolute safety while no one else can operate their choice of vehicle with any degree of safety or responsibility? And they get a pass on this? Bollocks.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:30 pm
by opik_bidin
Cyclophiliac wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:04 pm
Can someone please explain to me why so many people want "performance" cars, designed to do speeds that aren't legal in most places anyway? I don't understand it. When they do drive at the cars' designed speeds, people tend to end up dead. It makes no sense to me.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/moto ... cc82f461ba
Its a hobby. Same like many of us buying the latest road bike and time trial bike then hung it up near the dining table so you can boast about it to your family members and colleagues.
The other option is the full kit !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !!
Why the heck would people buy race bikes and then not race them?
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:35 pm
by opik_bidin
AAA seems to be a bit in the middle. While drivers mostly want cheaper fuel and reduced excise, AAA say the opposite.
It also seems they prop up rail and public transport too.
I think this Ukraine-Russia war could be nail in the coffin for big oilgas and big auto with so many transit and cycling advocates getting louder and showing their case.
Think AAA knows that reducing transport spending will mean private motorised transport budget will be cut, so they try to play safe
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 4605679737
AAA
Now’s the time to increase spending on roads, rail, and Public Transport. Tell your MP you want ALL of your fuel tax reinvested in your local transport network.
Re: War on cars
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 8:28 pm
by Cyclophiliac
opik_bidin wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:30 pm
Cyclophiliac wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 4:04 pm
Can someone please explain to me why so many people want "performance" cars, designed to do speeds that aren't legal in most places anyway? I don't understand it. When they do drive at the cars' designed speeds, people tend to end up dead. It makes no sense to me.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/moto ... cc82f461ba
Its a hobby. Same like many of us buying the latest road bike and time trial bike then hung it up near the dining table so you can boast about it to your family members and colleagues.
The other option is the full kit !! BAN ME NOW FOR SWEARING !!
Why the heck would people buy race bikes and then not race them?
I spend enough on my bicycles such that they're easier to ride (within reasonable price limits, of course). My choice of vehicle doesn't put bystanders in significant danger, because I'm in no danger of exceeding speed limits by as wide a margin as motor racers can (and do). So it's not really a valid comparison, there are too many differences between the 2 modes of transport.