Good read

Drunkmonkey
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:39 pm

Re: Good read

Postby Drunkmonkey » Wed May 26, 2010 10:58 pm

toolonglegs wrote: Pretty hard to prove me wrong when I am not stating a fact...that is the reason for the question mark...ie:I am asking one!.
Well know you know that a BMI of 21 is not high for a GT man :roll:

Drunkmonkey
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:39 pm

Re: Good read

Postby Drunkmonkey » Wed May 26, 2010 10:59 pm

rogan wrote:Apart from proving my point, is there something else I am supposed to be taking from this? BMI is not the gold standard for assessing athlete ability? For avoidance of doubt, I accept that.
Great so you did get the point that athletes other than discuss throwers, shot putters, heavyweight wrestlers, boxers and weightlifters could be over the healthy BMI (as you said you interpreted the link you found).

And a lot of basketballers are overweight on the BMI scale - when Michael Jordan was in his prime he was around 27 - 29 on the BMI scale, but he was far from being overweight.

User avatar
Wayfarer
Posts: 1225
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 6:39 pm
Location: SW Sydney

Re: Good read

Postby Wayfarer » Wed May 26, 2010 11:37 pm

Cmon guys, lets not argue about BMI. Nowdays, it's only used for general populations, and not individual athletes (reference my posterior lycra!) They both have very different body types, besides; good preparation, strong tactics and smart gearing will earn just as many points in the mountains (and maybe Lances downtube front-shifter..)
What are these salesmen peddling?

User avatar
toolonglegs
Posts: 15463
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Re: Good read

Postby toolonglegs » Thu May 27, 2010 12:13 am

We all enjoy a good argument sometimes...I do know that BMI is a generalized measurement that doesn't take into account body fat percentages.
But I am still surprised that Basso's race weight is 70kgs :wink: .

tripstobaltimore
Posts: 916
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 10:59 am

Re: Good read

Postby tripstobaltimore » Fri May 28, 2010 2:39 pm

I love the amount of eye rolling going on in this thread. :roll:

shiv
Posts: 611
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:37 pm
Location: 17th green, Glenelg Golf Course

Re: Good read

Postby shiv » Fri May 28, 2010 11:26 pm

Sooooooo, anyone wana go back to the original (interesting) topic?



And just so I fit in :roll:

User avatar
toolonglegs
Posts: 15463
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!

Re: Good read

Postby toolonglegs » Fri May 28, 2010 11:36 pm

well the is this...but I am not convinced (for the ITT)...it says I good do it in 50 minutes and I don't think so :roll: .
http://module.jp/tt/1/run.en.html#SI438 ... dO6Xh4kqcM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users