I really had to bite my tongue to avoid pointing out that he'd used the phrase 'lycra clad demons' in 'clarifying' that he wasn't talking about all cyclists, that he'd claimed cyclists had caused motorbikes to use the trail, and that I was apparently part of the problem simply because I was critical of him.foo on patrol wrote: ↑Wed Sep 06, 2023 1:39 pmYeah I saw that post but reframed from commenting on it, because once I do, it's all guns blazing and no prisoners left in my wake.Mr Purple wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2023 12:58 pmAnd after I pointed out I was getting a little sick of comments against cyclists in posts not actually related to cyclists, this great internet genius pipes up:
read my reasoning why a response was made against "SOME" cyclists, only a small group of arrogance in the community ! Normally the same ones that get upset with my responses!
I'm not making any further comment, I assume he's on a fast track to getting banned from the group. But typical hate speech - 'this wasn't directed at you, and I'm not saying you're in this group, but because you're upset at my generalisation against your group you're clearly guilty'.
Ah, Facebook. The steaming cesspool that it is.
Foo
It's a bit too much like shooting ducks in a barrel sometimes. Though the old adage about arguing with an idiot applies - they drag you down to their level and then beat you because they're more experienced there. Also 'playing chess with a pigeon' - they kick down the pieces and crap all over the board.