City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
- Retrobyte
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:43 pm
- Location: Sydney
City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby Retrobyte » Mon Sep 26, 2022 11:49 am
The new path through Mascot near the international terminal is a ripper, but once I got onto Bourke St/Rd it all went to pot. The first section on Bourke St where it crossed Gardeners Rd is counter intuitive - there is a dedicated green bike lane but the electronic light showing a bike remains red when the traffic lights are green, or when the pedestrian signal is green. After waiting a couple of traffic light sequences for the bicycle signal to be green I gave up and went with the pedestrians.
Then on Bourke Rd proper it's a slew of disjointed and missing sections - you'd be on a separated path for 200m and then it suddenly ends, and resumes as a shared footpath 50m up the road. This happens multiple times along Bourke Rd, and the signage is very poor. Once I reached Redfern I had to stop 3 or 4 times to work out the best way to get to the Anzac Bridge onramp. At one point I was near the ICC and the only way I could see to get to the Anzac Bridge was to cross the light rail line, ride through the multi level car park and exit that onto Murray St into Pyrmont where I had to stop and check Google Maps again to find the ramp to the Anzac Bridge.
Considering there are bike groups on Facebook where people sing the praises of how bike friendly Clover Moore's Council are, I was shocked at how messy the experience was yesterday. Everything was easy on the route except the bits that were actually in her Council area.
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:57 am
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby AndrewCowley » Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:13 pm
There are far better rides in Sydney. To the west you have the M7 shared path, to the north you have Ku-ring-gai Chase NP and the south you have the Royal NP. The latter two are exclusively on the road so not to everyone's liking.
It comes down to expectation vs reality. The patchwork quilt of cycling infrastructure has its limits. You'll need to use the road if you wish to exceed it. To what extent is it realistic to fill in the gaps?
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10617
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby find_bruce » Mon Sep 26, 2022 2:59 pm
It's a bit unfair to sheet the blame to Clover. Lights for example are the exclusive jurisdiction of the RMS who also control many of the roads. When Drunken Gay was the minister for trucks and cars the RMS was instructed to actively resist any cycleways & used a number of means which you have encountered here.
With the two more recent ministers things are somewhat better, but improvements are proceeding slowly.
People who sing the praises of the cycleways generally do so because there is a safe and connected path between where they are and where they want to go. As you have discovered, that ain't always the case
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2018 6:45 pm
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby mangoman » Mon Sep 26, 2022 5:55 pm
I think your expectations are unrealistic.
There is definitely still a lot of work to do in the actual Sydney CBD, its not that great. But you cant really have a cycleway going up every block (especially with the numbers we have). Ride through the middle of the Parramatta CBD which is nowhere near as busy and see how many protected cycle routes there are.
You will also need to know the routes to use them, which are not always laid out well and rarely on visible access roads.
Australia is so car-centric.
There are however access routes through many areas of the the Sydney City Council area. I challenge you to find any Council area which has put in as many separated cycleways as Sydney (this doesnt include easy stuff like motorways put in by the state governments).
Routes for heading towards bondi, and the inner west are generally better.
The SHB bridge approach could be better (if you are coming from the rocks), and out towards double bay doesnt really exist.
Even though Clover is pro-cycling, it doesnt mean she can do whatever she wants. There is still a massive amount of redtape and vocal/active anti-cycling community members. While i feel very few cyclists get involved in advocacy.
I believe its taken her 10 years to get this far, during times of vociferous anti-cycling sentiment.
Cycleways are expensive..... ESPECIALLY when a Council has to fund them.
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby trailgumby » Mon Sep 26, 2022 7:44 pm
The classic is the 6 seconds of green that cyclists get every two minutes at every set of lights along Kent St, and that's only if there's a cyclist already caught there on the grid, waiting. It used to add 10 minutes to my journey from Barangaroo north to the bridge.
-
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 11:13 pm
- Location: Western Sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby JPB » Mon Sep 26, 2022 10:24 pm
I was on pretty much the same ride except I started from Silverwater Bridge and detoured to Botany Bay at Kyeemagh.Retrobyte wrote: ↑Mon Sep 26, 2022 11:49 amYesterday I decided to do a loop and take in some of Clover Moore's bike lanes in the City of Sydney LGA that I hear so much about. My route was from Parramatta to Tempe via the Cook's River cycleway, and then through Mascot to the CBD, over the Anzac Bridge, and then back via the Bay Run and Concord.
While I had a rough idea where I was going I was pretty much relying on signs to guide me and somehow missed the connection from the airport section to the Bourke St cycleway.
I suspect that a number of signs ( all along the days route ) have been removed over time during other works and not replaced.
I think more prominent signs on the turns are required but I totally recommend the loop to anyone as it is quite flat and all shared paths bike lanes or very quite back streets.
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby mikesbytes » Mon Sep 26, 2022 10:39 pm
- AUbicycles
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15592
- Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: Sydney & Frankfurt
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby AUbicycles » Tue Sep 27, 2022 7:06 am
- familyguy
- Posts: 8398
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:30 pm
- Location: Willoughby, NSW
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby familyguy » Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:37 am
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21534
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby g-boaf » Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:03 am
Despite previous derogatory comments about the M7 and its riders, it is a decent bit of infrastructure in that it is fairly safe and well surfaced and non-stop. You can easily do a loop with M7, Camden, Northern Road and out to Windsor if you like in fairly easy conditions without having to be a navigation genius.AndrewCowley wrote: ↑Mon Sep 26, 2022 1:13 pmYes it's a patchwork quilt. If you live local to any of these then good luck to you if you can make them work. It depends very much on where you live and where you are going to. To attempt a long ride that straddles multiple bits and pieces of this infrastructure is painful. The few times I tried it, I got horribly lost trying to navigate one thing ending and the next thing starting. The signage would simply disappear. You either needed to know where to go (from past experience) or use navigation. The other hassle was you couldn't really ride properly given the shared nature of a lot of these paths. I suppose they have their purpose, but it didn't suit me.
There are far better rides in Sydney. To the west you have the M7 shared path, to the north you have Ku-ring-gai Chase NP and the south you have the Royal NP. The latter two are exclusively on the road so not to everyone's liking.
It comes down to expectation vs reality. The patchwork quilt of cycling infrastructure has its limits. You'll need to use the road if you wish to exceed it. To what extent is it realistic to fill in the gaps?
-
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:57 am
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby AndrewCowley » Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:25 am
It is very very good. However following the FB group for it, the number of posts recently about idiots on trail bikes is concerning.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21534
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby g-boaf » Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:41 am
That's always been a problem. There are so many entrances on the cycleway that it's hard to stop them. I had a near miss one afternoon on my commute home at eastern creek, the trail bike rider came wrong side of the blind S-curve, only me deliberately going slow helped avoid the guy (and his GF) on the trailbike. When I got about 200m further (roughly across from the Miele warehouse) I saw the carnage the trailbike rider caused, he knocked down two riders deliberately. Nobody could find out who the offender was. Me and another guy stopped to assist.AndrewCowley wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:25 am
It is very very good. However following the FB group for it, the number of posts recently about idiots on trail bikes is concerning.
It's even a problem on the cycleway out to Prospect Dam from Guildford - they get on that one, except there isn't a facebook page so you wouldn't know about it.
- Retrobyte
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2020 5:43 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby Retrobyte » Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:46 am
- peter
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:39 pm
- Location: sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby peter » Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:08 am
- peter
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:39 pm
- Location: sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby peter » Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:23 am
The other day while waiting to cross an intersection, an ute pulled up besides me, the driver side window was open. I causally turned to the driver to say "busy time to cross", just to ease the awkwardness because I felt he was staring at me. He didn't respond, moments later as he sped away he yelled "yes, get on the fking footpath". That was totally uncalled for.
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby trailgumby » Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:37 am
Retrobyte wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:46 amThe M7 path is really good infrastructure, if a little boring to ride regularly. It does link easily to other areas as g-boaf mentioned, including the Parramatta river path network and the Prospect canal path, so some lengthy loops that are quite safe are easy to map out and navigate. Given that and other good examples in greater metro Sydney like the Cook's River path and the new path sections around Mascot, that's the main reason I was disappointed by the City of Sydney sample I rode on the weekend. Perhaps there are better examples of Clover's work than the route I chose to ride from Mascot to the Anzac Bridge.
Currently, the M7 cycleway is under threat from plans by the owners to add extra lanes. This is not widely known.
They are also resisting plans to add public transport lanes, claiming there is no demand. This is hardly surprising, given the accessibility nightmare they have created, and is in my and others' opinions a form of grey corruption.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21534
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby g-boaf » Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:04 pm
Oh that's crap!trailgumby wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:37 amRetrobyte wrote: ↑Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:46 amThe M7 path is really good infrastructure, if a little boring to ride regularly. It does link easily to other areas as g-boaf mentioned, including the Parramatta river path network and the Prospect canal path, so some lengthy loops that are quite safe are easy to map out and navigate. Given that and other good examples in greater metro Sydney like the Cook's River path and the new path sections around Mascot, that's the main reason I was disappointed by the City of Sydney sample I rode on the weekend. Perhaps there are better examples of Clover's work than the route I chose to ride from Mascot to the Anzac Bridge.
Currently, the M7 cycleway is under threat from plans by the owners to add extra lanes. This is not widely known.
They are also resisting plans to add public transport lanes, claiming there is no demand. This is hardly surprising, given the accessibility nightmare they have created, and is in my and others' opinions a form of grey corruption.
Is there really a need for extra lanes on the M7. Whenever I've been on the motorway it flows fairly acceptably.
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby trailgumby » Tue Sep 27, 2022 2:42 pm
Objectively, not if the owners do what they should with facilitating access to public transport. However, this is one of those cases where shareholder interest and public interest fail to align. Who would have thought that might happen with privatising public assets?
- mikesbytes
- Super Mod
- Posts: 22183
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Tempe, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby mikesbytes » Tue Sep 27, 2022 10:21 pm
viewtopic.php?f=13&t=17399&p=1577862#p1577862
-
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby am50em » Mon Oct 24, 2022 9:29 am
https://youtube.com/shorts/yTOVohyr_B4?feature=share
- gururug
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:05 am
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby gururug » Sun Nov 13, 2022 9:39 pm
What she and her team instantiated with regard to making Sydney cycle friendly despite likely considerable constraints and opposition at the time was/is? truly remarkable.
Thankyou Clover may your achievements be a beacon for planners and infrastructure visionaries Australia wide.
-
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: City of Sydney being so-called "bike friendly"
Postby am50em » Wed Jul 12, 2023 12:32 pm
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the ... 5dn5n.html
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.