War on cars

human909
Posts: 9811
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: War on cars

Postby human909 » Thu Sep 12, 2019 10:52 pm

find_bruce wrote:I have not seen anyone able to explain why there is an increase in cars running off the road with ABS.
Why would you think ABS magically would fix that?
find_bruce wrote:Electronic stability control was supposedly going to fix that, but I haven't seen any data on whether it has.
Ditto.
find_bruce wrote:I readily accept they are all possibilities, but is there anything more concrete than anecdata on these explanations?
Likewise you could ask the same question about your about assumptions about ABS and ESC.

Neither of these 'improvements' to cars address the main cause of accidents. At best they play around the tiny edges.

User avatar
find_bruce
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11004
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: War on cars

Postby find_bruce » Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:27 am

No assumptions from me human- hence my sceptical comments about wanting actual data

By far the biggest improvement in “road toll” was decreasing the number needed of drunk drivers
Anything you can do, I can do slower

human909
Posts: 9811
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am

Re: War on cars

Postby human909 » Fri Sep 13, 2019 10:35 am

There seemed to be an implicit assumption in your statement that ABS and stability control would reduce cars running off the road. At least that was my apparently false interpretation.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22407
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: War on cars

Postby mikesbytes » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:23 pm

Yeh sometimes our comments can be understood differently to the intention

The problem with many "safety improvements" is that they don't improve the major problem, which is the nut behind the steering wheel/handlebars/skateboard/etc
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
find_bruce
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11004
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: War on cars

Postby find_bruce » Fri Sep 13, 2019 1:33 pm

human909 wrote:There seemed to be an implicit assumption in your statement that ABS and stability control would reduce cars running off the road. At least that was my apparently false interpretation.
No worries - that's the line car manufacturers have been selling & now they will trot out the same lines about auto emergency braking. Like you I am not buying that will be the result.
Anything you can do, I can do slower

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:08 pm

Whenever someone tells you that you should make eye contact with the driver. Nope, it's the drivers job to look out for pedestrians, and the Transport department to make safe crosswalks and footpaths

-----------------------------

CAR company studying ped interactions w driverless cars discovered a curious fact: "over 90% of people cannot determine gaze of driver at 15m or see driver at all at 30m", the typical distance needed for a car traveling only 25 mph approaching x-walk

https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... nd_Drivers

User avatar
Ross
Posts: 5742
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby Ross » Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:29 pm

What Is The Number One Killer Of People Ages 5 to 29?

Road traffic injuries

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... 5cb784363f
It is the leading cause of death among children and young adults around the world. It is the ninth leading cause of death overall globally. It resulted in about 1.35 million people dying in 2016 alone. It will probably become the seventh leading killer worldwide by 2030.
"Every day, 29 people in the United States die in motor vehicle crashes that involve an alcohol-impaired driver. This is one death every 50 minutes. The annual cost of alcohol-related crashes totals more than $44 billion."

User avatar
Comedian
Posts: 9166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: War on cars

Postby Comedian » Wed Sep 18, 2019 3:50 pm

Ross wrote:What Is The Number One Killer Of People Ages 5 to 29?

Road traffic injuries

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2 ... 5cb784363f
It is the leading cause of death among children and young adults around the world. It is the ninth leading cause of death overall globally. It resulted in about 1.35 million people dying in 2016 alone. It will probably become the seventh leading killer worldwide by 2030.
"Every day, 29 people in the United States die in motor vehicle crashes that involve an alcohol-impaired driver. This is one death every 50 minutes. The annual cost of alcohol-related crashes totals more than $44 billion."
Never mind that.. the leading cause of deaths amongst 1-14 in Aus is in their parents cars!

https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/life-ex ... s-of-death

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Thu Sep 19, 2019 2:57 pm

From a BUG meeting regarding Stacey st widening and putting a shared path there at Bankstwon. We Requested the shared path has some shade and buffer against traffic in the form of some plants (either tree or bushes), because it is unpleasant riding beside a motorway with no shade and immediately drummed by the noise and pollution.

The reply was something on the line of no because emergencies and it is dangerous, but the Transport dept can make the green strip near the houses.

we all had a reaction of, " trees near the road are dangerous, so they must be moved further back, so cars can easily crush peds n cycs on the shared path." there should be some buffer there, if for cars are dangerous, what about the peds and cyclists who are immediately hit without any barrier?

They also cite the speeds around 60 kmh (in a "street" near Bankstown CBD), certainly around CBDs you need to slow down and go 30 kmh.

fat and old
Posts: 6331
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
Location: Mill Park

Re: War on cars

Postby fat and old » Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:13 pm

https://www3.forbes.com/business/fatal- ... 126800d1au

Deadliest cars on the road!

Ticks all the boxes.

American, so no relevance to our market or life. Tick!
Models that are not available here anyway. Tick!
Sensationalist. Tick!


All right all right all right!

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Mon Sep 23, 2019 2:59 pm

Why are there no cars here?

a jaydriver was so dangerous to others and caused a carnage

the history of Mackinac Island

Image

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:25 pm



If you're in a crosswalk with Hi viz and drivers still don't slow down, It's not you who is in the wrong, its the drivers

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:31 pm

You should not need to be a superhuman to get down the street

From Make Way Day in ENgland 26 Sept 2019


fat and old
Posts: 6331
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 12:06 pm
Location: Mill Park

Re: War on cars

Postby fat and old » Wed Oct 02, 2019 5:47 pm

opik_bidin wrote:

If you're in a crosswalk with Hi viz and drivers still don't slow down, It's not you who is in the wrong, its the drivers
There were 25 people cited for that in a 1.5hrs police sting. Nice wide roads, nothing obscuring the crosswalk signs in case you don't realise the change in pavement. Bad. Very bad.

Te cops used a measurement to walk out on cue. When a car was app. 40 metres away, assuming they obey the limit (app. 50Km/h) there was apparently room to stop safely according to their NHSTA. Do we use a similar speed/measurement here?

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:44 pm

so, what's next? footpath should have rails, peds wear hi viz armour and have a helmet?

all to worship the car

It's only 12%, most often ut's the driver at fault, if not probably the traffic engineer who designed the road/street

https://mobile.twitter.com/7NewsMelbour ... 2848334848

7NEWS Melbourne
@7NewsMelbourne
Seniors are being encouraged to wear high visibility vests when they're out walking. It's hoped the move will reduce the number of elderly pedestrians killed on our roads, but critics doubt it will have an impact, because drivers are often at fault. @MelinaSarris7
#7NEWS

User avatar
Thoglette
Posts: 6729
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 1:01 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby Thoglette » Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:09 pm

opik_bidin wrote:
It's only 12%, most often ut's the driver at fault, if not probably the traffic engineer who designed the road/street
Don't forget the nameless bureaucrat who decided to set the speed limit at 80% of the design speed of road/street.

Not the speed that reflects the risks an MV at that speed presents to, you know, the people using the urban space (as opposed to passing through in a car).

Don't forget the nameless bureaucrat who decided it was more important to run Operation Pedro than to address MV misbehaviour
Stop handing them the stick! - Dave Moulton
"People are worthy of respect, ideas are not." Peter Ellerton, UQ

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Fri Oct 04, 2019 5:39 am

Image

ironhanglider
Posts: 2849
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 9:44 pm
Location: Middle East, Melbourne

Re: War on cars

Postby ironhanglider » Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:10 am



It'd be funny if it wasn't true...


Cheers,

Cameron

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:08 pm

makes me remember the Bourke st article in telegraph

Image

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Tue Oct 08, 2019 10:10 pm

Thoglette wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2019 5:09 pm

Don't forget the nameless bureaucrat who decided it was more important to run Operation Pedro than to address MV misbehaviour
and at Bike week too, what a way to promote cycling

Image

Image

opik_bidin
Posts: 970
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: War on cars

Postby opik_bidin » Fri Oct 11, 2019 9:29 am

calling for more infra funding :
Give me more highways for cheap so I can extort money

https://www.afr.com/companies/infrastru ... 010-p52zdb

Transurban chairman Lindsay Maxsted has backed the Reserve Bank of Australia's calls for more investment in infrastructure to boost the economy and warns traffic growth on the company's toll roads is slowing

User avatar
Comedian
Posts: 9166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: War on cars

Postby Comedian » Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:13 pm

And let there be outrage and indignation.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-13/ ... e/11597022

We dive because public transport isn't good enough! But it's not good enough because we all drive. :roll:

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22407
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: War on cars

Postby mikesbytes » Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:41 pm

Congestion tax on CBD's? There's only about 6 roads into Sydney CBD so that its not that hard to put up the equipment that uses the motorway tags. Melbourne has more roads but still way doable

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-13/ ... e/11597022
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

User avatar
Comedian
Posts: 9166
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: War on cars

Postby Comedian » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:24 pm

All those fuel efficiency savings frittered on bigger cars.

https://www.drive.com.au/news/suvs-are- ... ign=tile-4

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 22407
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: War on cars

Postby mikesbytes » Wed Oct 16, 2019 6:32 pm

Comedian wrote:
Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:24 pm
All those fuel efficiency savings frittered on bigger cars.

https://www.drive.com.au/news/suvs-are- ... ign=tile-4
Pretty much the only way to change purchase behaviour is to introduce behavioural tax. If the Govt wants to reduce petrol consumption then tax it more. The tax gain could be used to offset the cost of low energy alternatives such as providing better public transport, adding cycle paths etc etc. Hang on, I'm preaching to the converted
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]